![those who remain documentary those who remain documentary](https://i.pinimg.com/736x/6c/71/df/6c71dfa682b00e55cd2f0f9c7bba3b04--short-films-wealth.jpg)
Lest it be forgotten we all breath the same air: yes the same air that Bannon and his oil pipeline buddies would want us to believe are good for jobs and good for the environment.
Since the doc tends to reproduce tendency of 'Americans' to presume they are indispensable, I could easily laugh it off and say that as a Canadian, 'not my circus not my monkey' - but as evidenced by the doc, we have the same, exact same, problem here in Canada.
![those who remain documentary those who remain documentary](https://img.youtube.com/vi/bfFYZffstok/maxresdefault.jpg)
What people who really claim to love and want freedom not see that they are being divided and ruled by people from the same class of pimps (ie., Clinton's and Bannon's) for the old robber barron class and the new corporate predators. So (b): information is information, and knowledge is only power if one has authority to use or abuse it, so this is relevant to the extent that the comments indicate that the whole anti-communism and anti-Clinton line promoted by the doc resonates with some of the review commenters (assuming they are genuine). Did any of the people in the US watch that far or stopped when their ideological preferences were confirmed or disconfirmed? Maybe this explains why only one talking head to parrot a line of distraction from the fact that elites, regardless of their political clothing, all deal with the same bankers behind the scenes. Bannon (aka, the mastermind behind Breitbart and the brains behind an equally corrupt Trump administration). So (a): well who is behind the film? Stephen K. Is Clinton Cash an honest examination of corruption at the highest level? Or is it merely one component of a baseless, unsubstantiated smear campaign meant to derail her current race to the White House? Avid supporters of Clinton are unlikely to be swayed by the barrage of accusations presented in the film, but it may provide a convincing argument for those who remain on the fence this election cycle.Īs a Canadian watching this doc, I waited with patience through the good of this doc (the Clinton's as exemplars of people's governments and resources being lifted under their feet by the circulation of elites in and out of government) and the bad (the Clinton's are the ONLY self-enriching USA influence pimps) to first a) figure out whose behind a documentary with only one talking head and b) to see whether, or more correctly how soon, comments would break down into tribalism among US viewers. In each instance, the film charges that these curious dealings and a significant lack of transparency speak to a larger cover-up of global proportions. The filmmakers detail similarly shady incidents in the foundation's dealings with Nigeria, Africa, Haiti and other ravaged regions of the world.Īlso included in the discussion are Bill Clinton's astronomical speaking fees, possible political favors that have transpired in the wake of sizeable donations, charitable outreach efforts that may have doubled for "pay and play" deals, and the couple's mounting personal fortunes in the years since they first left the Oval Office. Following this generous donation, then Secretary of State Clinton ended her public pleas for freedom and democracy in the region. According to the information contained in the film, the foundation received $100 million dollars from that country's dictator - Mobutu Sese Seko.
![those who remain documentary those who remain documentary](https://i0.wp.com/parallax-view.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Theyremain.jpeg)
Such is the case in the Republic of Congo, a devastated region riddled with widespread human rights catastrophes. The film contends that their improprieties begin with the questionable associations they keep. Wherever the Clintons go, controversy ensues. Has the enormous success of the world-renowned philanthropic organization fattened the wallets of this political power couple? Have foreign governments been given special privileges that are commensurate with the magnitude of their donations?Ĭoinciding with the release of the hotly anticipated expose of the same name by author Peter Schweizer, the new documentary Clinton Cash couldn't be timelier in the heat of this tumultuous election season, and its revelations are certain to rile voters from both sides of the aisle. At the center of this debate are her finances, and the inner workings of the popular Clinton Foundation she co-founded with her husband, former President Bill Clinton. Nagging questions persist regarding the trustworthiness of Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.